Virtue Epistemology and Explanatory Salience

In Heather Battaly (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Virtue Epistemology. Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Robust virtue epistemology holds that knowledge is true belief obtained through cognitive ability. In this essay I explain that robust virtue epistemology faces a dilemma, and the viability of the theory depends on an adequate understanding of the ‘through’ relation. Greco interprets this ‘through’ relation as one of causal explanation; the success is through the agent’s abilities iff the abilities play a sufficiently salient role in a causal explanation of why she possesses a true belief. In this paper I argue that Greco’s account of the ‘through’ relation is inadequate. I describe kinds of counterexample and explain why salience is the wrong kind of property to track epistemically relevant conditions or to capture the nature of knowledge. Advocates of robust virtue epistemology should develop an alternative account of the ‘through’ relation. I also argue that virtue epistemology should employ an environment-relative interpretation of epistemic virtue.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GARVEA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge as Credit for True Belief.John Greco - 2003 - In Michael DePaul & Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. Clarendon Press. pp. 111-134.
Virtue Epistemology.Turri, John; Alfano, Mark & Greco, John

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-23

Total views
103 ( #24,972 of 41,635 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #26,106 of 41,635 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.