Abstract
This paper is based on Ludwig Wittgenstein's (late) teaching on language and
meaning, and its aim is to show how we can avoid the anthropomorphization of artificial
intelligence or interpreting the work (the question of giving meaning) of AI as
similar to or the same as the work of a human being. The way of determining the
meaning of certain linguistic units performed by an AI and a human differs because
the languages they operate with have a different set of rules or criteria that are
indicators of what a certain linguistic entity means. The core of AI in terms of
meaning is its logical base, according to which it operates/calculates/manipulates
the given information. On the other hand, a human being finds his/her criteria in
the language activity performed in the language communities.