Finding Consistency in Rousseau

Philosophy Study 2 (9) (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Several of Rousseau’s critics begin with the presupposition that his writings are inconsistent or incoherent and proceed to locate the “essence” of his philosophy in some of his writings while excluding others. Ernst Cassirer is among the few philosophers who have attempted to defend Rousseau’s claim to consistency. Despite its broad influence, Cassirer’s interpretation has remained largely unchallenged. The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, it aims to show that Cassirer’s interpretation undermines (a) the important role Rousseau assigns to pity in both the state of nature and civil society and (b) the significant role the general will plays in his political theory. Secondly, it proposes an alternative interpretation that succeeds in uniting Rousseau’s opus.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-11-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
909 ( #4,750 of 2,427,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #20,600 of 2,427,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.