Folgt aus dem unwert der Tierhaltung ein Verbot des Fleischkonsums?

Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):257-267 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is natural to assume that it can only be morally permissible for consumers to buy meat products if the breeding and killing of animals for the purpose of meat production is morally acceptable. is assumption presupposes a stable and morally relevant connection between the consumption and the production of meat. While both act-consequentialism and the Kantian idea of generalizability initially appear to support that view, neither of them succeeds in establishing a connection of the required kind
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-05-31
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
479 ( #14,042 of 65,695 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #14,030 of 65,695 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.