Folgt aus dem unwert der tierhaltung ein verbot Des fleischkonsums?

Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):257-267 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is natural to assume that it can only be morally permissible for consumers to buy meat products if the breeding and killing of animals for the purpose of meat production is morally acceptable. is assumption presupposes a stable and morally relevant connection between the consumption and the production of meat. While both act-consequentialism and the Kantian idea of generalizability initially appear to support that view, neither of them succeeds in establishing a connection of the required kind

Author's Profile

Simon Gaus
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
788 (#15,673)

6 months
112 (#27,330)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?