The Domination of States: Towards an Inclusice Republican Law of Peoples.

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract: The article aims to sharpen the neo-republican contribution to international political thought by challenging Pettit’s view that only representative states may raise a valid claim to non-domination in their external relations. The argument proceeds in two steps: First I show that, conceptually speaking, the domination of states, whether representative or not, implies dominating the collective people at least in its fundamental, constitutive power. Secondly, the domination of states – and thus of their peoples – cannot be justified normatively in the name of promoting individual non-domination because such a compensatory rationale misconceives the notion of domination in terms of a discrete exercise of power instead of as an ongoing power relation. This speaks in favour of a more inclusive law of peoples than Pettit (just as his liberal counterpart Rawls) envisages: In order to accommodate the claim of collective peoples to non-domination it has to recognize every state as a member of the international order.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-10-27
Latest version: 1 (2020-10-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #51,276 of 64,243 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,618 of 64,243 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.