Appearance and Illusion

Mind 123 (490):339-376 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Recent debates between representational and relational theories of perceptual experience sometimes fail to clarify in what respect the two views differ. In this essay, I explain that the relational view rejects two related claims endorsed by most representationalists: the claim that perceptual experiences can be erroneous, and the claim that having the same representational content is what explains the indiscriminability of veridical perceptions and phenomenally matching illusions or hallucinations. I then show how the relational view can claim that errors associated with perception should be explained in terms of false judgments, and develop a theory of illusions based on the idea that appearances are properties of objects in the surrounding environment. I provide an account of why appearances are sometimes misleading, and conclude by showing how the availability of this view undermines one of the most common ways of motivating representationalist theories of perception
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-02-11
Latest version: 2 (2013-02-11)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,192 ( #4,757 of 72,515 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #10,275 of 72,515 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.