The Knowledge Argument

In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. MacMillan (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The definitive statement of the Knowledge Argument was formulated by Frank Jackson, in a paper entitled “Epiphenomenal Qualia” that appeared in The Philosophical Quarterly in 1982. Arguments in the same spirit had appeared earlier (Broad 1925, Robinson 1982), but Jackson’s argument is most often compared with Thomas Nagel’s argument in “What is it Like to be a Bat?” (1974). Jackson, however, takes pains to distinguish his argument from Nagel’s. This entry will follow standard practice in focusing on Jackson’s argument, though I will also describe the main points of alleged similarity and dissimilarity between these two arguments.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GERTKA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
484 ( #5,183 of 39,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #12,991 of 39,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.