The Knowledge Argument

In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. MacMillan (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The definitive statement of the Knowledge Argument was formulated by Frank Jackson, in a paper entitled “Epiphenomenal Qualia” that appeared in The Philosophical Quarterly in 1982. Arguments in the same spirit had appeared earlier (Broad 1925, Robinson 1982), but Jackson’s argument is most often compared with Thomas Nagel’s argument in “What is it Like to be a Bat?” (1974). Jackson, however, takes pains to distinguish his argument from Nagel’s. This entry will follow standard practice in focusing on Jackson’s argument, though I will also describe the main points of alleged similarity and dissimilarity between these two arguments.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GERTKA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
585 ( #7,302 of 53,510 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,038 of 53,510 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.