Too similar, too different? The paradoxical dualism of psychiatric stigma

The Psychiatric Bulletin 38 (4):148-151 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Challenges to psychiatric stigma fall between a rock and a hard place. Decreasing one prejudice may inadvertently increase another. Emphasising similarities between mental illness and ‘ordinary’ experience to escape the fear-related prejudices associated with the imagined ‘otherness’ of persons with mental illness risks conclusions that mental illness indicates moral weakness and the loss of any benefits of a medical model. An emphasis on illness and difference from normal experience risks a response of fear of the alien. Thus, a ‘likeness-based’ and ‘unlikeness-based’ conception of psychiatric stigma can lead to prejudices stemming from paradoxically opposing assumptions about mental illness. This may create a troubling impasse for anti-stigma campaigns.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GERTST-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-03-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-03-08

Total views
25 ( #61,233 of 2,449,140 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #37,819 of 2,449,140 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.