A Critique of the Standard Chronology of Plato's Dialogues

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
That i) there is a somehow determined chronology of Plato’s dialogues among all the chronologies of the last century and ii) this theory is subject to many objections, are points this article intends to discuss. Almost all the main suggested chronologies of the last century agree that Parmenides and Theaetetus should be located after dialogues like Meno, Phaedo and Republic and before Sophist, Politicus, Timaeus, Laws and Philebus. The eight objections we brought against this arrangement claim that to place the dialogues like Meno, Phaedo and Republic both immediately after the early ones and before Parmenides and Theaetetus is epistemologically and ontologically problematic.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GHOACO
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-03-05
Latest version: 2 (2016-03-07)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-03-05

Total views
95 ( #34,461 of 51,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,291 of 51,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.