Qualia: They’re Not What They Seem

Philosophical Studies 126 (3):397-428 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Whether or not qualia are ways things seem, the view that qualia have the properties typically attributed to them is unjustified. Ways things seem do not have many of the properties commonly attributed to them. For example, inverted ways things seem are impossible. If ways things seem do not have the features commonly attributed to them, and qualia do have those same features, this looks like good reason to distinguish the two. But if your reasons for believing that qualia have the features are epistemically on a par with reasons for believing that ways things seem have the features, and you know that ways things seem do not have the features, then those reasons cannot justify your belief that qualia have the features. I argue that the reasons are epistemically on a par in this way
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
167 ( #36,426 of 65,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #63,930 of 65,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.