Winning counterterrorism's version of Pascal's wager, but struggling to open the purse

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):368-369 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lankford’s (2013) essential empirical argument, which is based on evidence such as psychological autopsies, is that suicide attacks are caused by suicidality. By operationalizing this causal claim in a hypothetical experiment, I show the claim to be provable, and I contend that its truth is supported by Lankford’s data. However, I question the success of his follow-on arguments about beauty and goodness.

Author's Profile

Brian J. Gibbs
University of Chicago (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-29

Downloads
375 (#58,331)

6 months
95 (#57,696)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?