Agreements, coercion, and obligation

Ethics 103 (4):679-706 (1993)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Typical agreements can be seen as joint decisions, inherently involving obligations of a distinctive kind. These obligations derive from the joint commitment' that underlies a joint decision. One consequence of this understanding of agreements and their obligations is that coerced agreements are possible and impose obligations. It is not that the parties to an agreement should always conform to it, all things considered. Unless one is released from the agreement, however, one has some reason to conform to it, whatever else is true. In this sense, one is under an obligation to the other parties. The relevance of these points to the issue of political obligation is discussed.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-04
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
338 ( #19,807 of 2,454,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,226 of 2,454,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.