Composition and the Logic of Location: An Argument for Regionalism

Mind 129 (513):159-178 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ned Markosian has recently defended a new theory of composition, which he calls regionalism : some material objects xx compose something if and only if there is a material object located at the fusion of the locations of xx. Markosian argues that regionalism follows from what he calls the subregion theory of parthood. Korman and Carmichael agree. We provide countermodels to show that regionalism does not follow from, even together with fourteen potentially implicit background principles. We then show that regionalism does follow from five of those background principles together with and two additional principles connecting parthood and location, which we call and. While the additional principles are not uncontroversial, our conjecture is that many will find them attractive. We conclude by mentioning that fills a previously unnoticed gap in the formal theory of location presented in Parsons.

Author Profiles

Cody Gilmore
University of California, Davis
Matt Leonard
California Baptist University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-10

Downloads
433 (#19,629)

6 months
56 (#15,982)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?