Should causal models always be Markovian? The case of multi-causal forks in medicine

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The development of causal modelling since the 1950s has been accompanied by a number of controversies, the most striking of which concerns the Markov condition. Reichenbach's conjunctive forks did satisfy the Markov condition, while Salmon's interactive forks did not. Subsequently some experts in the field have argued that adequate causal models should always satisfy the Markov condition, while others have claimed that non-Markovian causal models are needed in some cases. This paper argues for the second position by considering the multi-causal forks, which are widespread in contemporary medicine (Section 2). A non-Markovian causal model for such forks is introduced and shown to be mathematically tractable (Sections 6, 7, and 8). The paper also gives a general discussion of the controversy about the Markov condition (Section 1), and of the related controversy about probabilistic causality (Sections 3, 4, and 5)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GILSCM
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-07-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causation, Prediction, and Search.Spirtes, Peter; Glymour, Clark & Scheines, Richard

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-07-27

Total views
743 ( #3,086 of 41,612 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #4,707 of 41,612 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.