Abortion and the Argument from Potential: What We Owe to the Ones Who Might Exist

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):49-59 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Next SectionI challenge the idea that the argument from potential (AFP) represents a valid moral objection to abortion. I consider the form of AFP that was defended by Hare, which holds that abortion is against the interests of the potential person who is prevented from existing. My reply is that AFP, though not unsound by itself, does not apply to the issue of abortion. The reason is that AFP only works in the cases of so-called same number and same people choices, but it falsely presupposes that abortion is such a kind of choice. This refutation of AFP implies that (1) abortion is not only morally permissible but sometimes even morally mandatory and (2) abortion is morally permissible even when the potential person’s life is foreseen to be worth living

Author's Profile

Alberto Giubilini
UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Milano (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-13

Downloads
1,246 (#12,987)

6 months
170 (#18,983)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?