Fact-Introspection, Thing-Introspection, and Inner Awareness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Phenomenal beliefs are beliefs about the phenomenal properties of one's concurrent conscious states. It is an article of common sense that such beliefs tend to be justified. Philosophers have been less convinced. It is sometimes claimed that phenomenal beliefs are not on the whole justified, on the grounds that they are typically based on introspection and introspection is often unreliable. Here we argue that such reasoning must guard against a potential conflation between two distinct introspective phenomena, which we call fact-introspection and thing -introspection; arguments for the unreliability of introspection typically target only the former, leaving the reliability of the latter untouched. In addition, we propose a theoretical framework for understanding thing -introspection that may have a surprising consequence: thing -introspection is not only reliable, but outright infallible. This points at a potential line of defense of phenomenal-belief justification, which here we only sketch very roughly
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-07-01
Latest version: 4 (2015-10-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind.Morton, Adam & Churchland, Paul

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Editorial: Consciousness and Inner Awareness.Farrell, Jonathan & McClelland, Tom

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
662 ( #3,097 of 38,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #3,692 of 38,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.