The Free Choice Permission as a Default Rule

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is quite plausible to say that you may read or write implies that you may read and you may write (though possibly not both at once). This so-called free choice principle is well-known in deontic logic. Sadly, despite being so intuitive and seemingly innocent, this principle causes a lot of worries. The paper briefly but critically examines leading accounts of free choice permission present in the literature. Subsequently, the paper suggests to accept the free choice principle, but only as a default (or defeasible) rule, issuing to it a ticket-of-leave, granting it some freedom, until it commits an undesired inference.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GLATFC
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Children Interpret Disjunction as Conjunction: Consequences for Theories of Implicature and Child Development.Singh, Raj; Wexler, Ken; Astle-Rahim, Andrea; Kamawar, Deepthi & Fox, Danny

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-15

Total views
45 ( #39,376 of 45,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,178 of 45,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.