Serial Endosymbiosis Theory and the Hierarchy of rps Genes

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I agree with Michael Buratovich concerning the validity of the serial endosymbiosis theory, and that neo-Darwinian mechanics alone do not explain the grand history of universal phylogeny (PSCF 57, no. 2 [June 2005]: 98-113). However, I disagree with the Buratovich hypothesis that the hierarchal transfer of ribosomal protein small unit (rps) genes from mitochondrial genomes to nuclear genomes indicates inbuilt Intelligent Design (ID) instead of neo-Darwinian mechanics, where inbuilt ID involves "purposeful forces that are wholly natural in their scope and activity."
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-05
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #50,026 of 58,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #55,950 of 58,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.