You Are Only as Good as You Are Behind Closed Doors: The Stability of Virtuous Dispositions

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Virtues are standardly characterized as stable dispositions. A stable disposition implies that the virtuous actor must be disposed to act well in any domain required of them. For example, a politician is not virtuous if s/he is friendly in debate with an opponent, but hostile at home with a partner or children. Some recent virtue theoretic accounts focus on specific domains in which virtues can be exercised. I call these domain-variant accounts of virtue. This paper examines two such accounts: Randall Curren and Charles Dorn’s (2018) discussion of virtue in the civic sphere, and Michael Brady’s (2018) account of virtues of vulnerability. I argue that being consistent with the standard characterization of virtue requires generalizing beyond a domain. I suggest four actions the authors could take to preserve their accounts while remaining consistent with the standard characterization. I also discuss how virtue education could be enhanced by domain-variant accounts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOLYAO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-13

Total views
139 ( #32,958 of 57,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
94 ( #6,423 of 57,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.