Abstract
The title of this presentation encompasses three issues: (1) an enigmatic theme
(the play of signs and signs of play); (2) a model of doing something, such
as unraveling a puzzle; and (3) a methodology dealing with a probable case.
Considering that the order of analysis runs in the opposite direction to the
order of experience, my first task is to reverse the title. Then, its three parts
become: (1) an eidetic and empirical conjunction that implies a taste for evidence;
(2) a rigorous model of analysis that implies a relationship between
ontology (what I know) and epistemology (how I know); and (3) a case that
brings an enigmatic theme. My title, based in the theme of our 42nd Annual
Meeting, provided an experience peculiar to a non-native English speaker:
how to interpret and use the word “play”. I really felt like I was a living exemplar
of one of Professor Lanigan’s favorite examples: what dictionaries and
encyclopedias say or do not say. Lanigan said that “dictionaries tell you how
to use the words (forms, ideas) but not what word to use” and “encyclopedias
tell you what facts to use (structure, experience), but not how to use them”
(1992: 208–209). That was my situation with the word “play”. Webster’s dictionary
gave me around fifty different meanings for the word “play”. Which one
should I choose? I am sure that I made the best choice, as I will demonstrate
throughout this presentation, organized around these three ideas that in an
inverse order would be theory, method, and case.