On experimental and philosophical investigations of mental timing: A response to commentary

Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):304-307 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Reinterpretations of Libet's results have received support from most commentaries. Libet's arguments against alternative hypotheses are contested. Latency depends on intensity. Integration of intensity and duration explains the Minimum Train Duration. Analogies of Libet's timing of intentions with control experiments indicate biases of opposite signs, according to intramodal or intermodal results. Rosenthal's view of nonconscious intentions becoming conscious after a delay is favored. Compatibilist free will is discussed
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOMOEA
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-03-25
Latest version: 2 (2018-07-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
215 ( #20,275 of 50,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #29,803 of 50,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.