The interpretation of Libet's results on the timing of conscious events: A commentary

Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):221-230 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A commentary on articles by Klein, Pockett, and Trevena and Miller, in this issue, is given. Average shift in the point of subjective equality , calculated by Klein on Libet's data, and corresponding change in mean shift, calculated by Libet et al. , may be “corrected,” taking as a reference point the end of the minimum train duration. Values obtained, if significant, indicate a latency for conscious sensation of the skin stimulus of at least 230 ms. Pockett's main conclusions are favored, but her explanation of peripheral–lemniscal couplings is found to be unconvincing. Trevena and Miller's article unsuccessfully tries to rescue a dualist interactionist view. Libet's method of timing intentions is thoroughly criticized
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-03-25
Latest version: 2 (2018-07-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
499 ( #13,384 of 65,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #46,328 of 65,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.