Cognitivism, Significance and Singular Thought

Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):236-260 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper has a narrow and a broader target. The narrow target is a particular version of what I call the mental-files conception of singular thought, proposed by Robin Jeshion, and known as cognitivism. The broader target is the MFC in general. I give an argument against Jeshion's view, which gives us preliminary reason to reject the MFC more broadly. I argue Jeshion's theory of singular thought should be rejected because the central connection she makes between significance and singularity does not hold. However, my argument grants Jeshion's claim that there is a connection between significance and file-thinking. The upshot is not only that we have reason to reject Jeshion's significance constraint on singular thought, but that we have reason to question the connection made by MFC proponents between file-thinking and singularity.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Reference Book.Hawthorne, John & Manley, David
Mental Files.Recanati, Fran├žois

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #25,314 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #22,664 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.