On 'Deduction' and the Inductive/Deductive Distinction

Studies in Logic 5 (3) (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The definitions of ‘deduction’ found in virtually every introductory logic textbook would encourage us to believe that the inductive/deductive distinction is a distinction among kinds of arguments and that the extension of ‘deduction’ is a determinate class of arguments. In this paper, we argue that that this approach is mistaken. Specifically, we defend the claim that typical definitions of ‘deduction’ operative in attempts to get at the induction/deduction distinction are either too narrow or insufficiently precise. We conclude by presenting a deflationary understanding of the inductive/deductive distinction; in our view, its content is nothing over and above the answers to two fundamental sorts of questions central to critical thinking.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-02-29
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
726 ( #6,810 of 59,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #13,562 of 59,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.