Williams and the Desirability of Body‐Bound Immortality Revisited

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Bernard Williams argues that human mortality is a good thing because living forever would necessarily be intolerably boring. His argument is often attacked for unfoundedly proposing asymmetrical requirements on the desirability of living for mortal and immortal lives. My first aim in this paper is to advance a new interpretation of Williams' argument that avoids these objections, drawing in part on some of his other writings to contextualize it. My second aim is to show how even the best version of his argument only supports a somewhat weaker thesis: it may be possible for some people with certain special psychological features to enjoy an immortal life, but no one has good reason to bet on being such a person.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2016, 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-07-17
Latest version: 1 (2017-07-17)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Immortality and Boredom.Fischer, John Martin & Mitchell-Yellin, Benjamin

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
355 ( #9,422 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
104 ( #4,536 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.