Space Colonization and Existential Risk

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ian Stoner has recently argued that we ought not to colonize Mars because doing so would flout our pro tanto obligation not to violate the principle of scientific conservation, and there is no countervailing considerations that render our violation of the principle permissible. While I remain agnostic on, my primary goal in this article is to challenge : there are countervailing considerations that render our violation of the principle permissible. As such, Stoner has failed to establish that we ought not to colonize Mars. I close with some thoughts on what it would take to show that we do have an obligation to colonize Mars and related issues concerning the relationship between the way we discount our preferences over time and projects with long time horizons, like space colonization.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOTVAP
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-03-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-03-16

Total views
806 ( #5,467 of 58,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
250 ( #1,714 of 58,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.