Institutional Corruption and the Rule of Law

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The literature contains two concepts of corruption which are often confused with one another: corruption as twisted character (pollution), and corruption as disloyalty. It also contains two sites for corruption: the corruption of individuals, and the corruption of entire institutions such as a state or a legislature.This paper first draws a clear distinction between the pollution and disloyalty concepts of corruption in the individual context, and then defends a conception of disloyalty corruption according to which the distinguishing feature is an agent who uses powers delegated to her from her principal as her own. Then, the paper shifts gears to the institutional context, arguing that the best account of institutional corruption in the extant literature is of the pollution kind. It then fills the remaining logical space by laying out a conception of institutional corruption as disloyalty and explaining its moral significance for the political legitimacy of a democracy.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOWICA
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-07-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-04-25

Total views
172 ( #25,736 of 53,012 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #49,214 of 53,012 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.