Lexical-rule predicativism about names

Synthese 195 (12):5549-5569 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Predicativists hold that proper names have predicate-type semantic values. They face an obvious challenge: in many languages names normally occur as, what appear to be, grammatical arguments. The standard version of predicativism answers this challenge by positing an unpronounced determiner in bare occurrences. I argue that this is a mistake. Predicativists should draw a distinction between two kinds of semantic type—underived semantic type and derived semantic type. The predicativist thesis concerns the underived semantic type of proper names and underdetermines a view about the semantic type of bare occurrences. I’ll argue that predicativists should hold that bare names are derived individual-denoting expressions. I end by considering what this result means for the relationship between predicativism and other metalinguistic theories of names.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-06-20
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
229 ( #27,263 of 2,448,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #25,369 of 2,448,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.