Drug Laws, Ethics, and History

Filozofia 74 (2):95 - 110 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I present and criticize several historical arguments in favour of prohibition and criminalization of illicit psychoactive substances. I consider several versions of Charles Brent’s argument from drug harms and an argument from addiction based on Kantian view on autonomy. My criticism will mainly rely on empirical evidence on drugs, drug use, and addiction. I think that in light of this evidence, all of the arguments lose their cogency or can be refuted altogether. Moreover, the evidence reveals an inconsistency in the international drug law framework. In conclusion, I therefore provide a general argument challenging the legitimacy of the existing distinction between licit and illicit drugs based on the inconsistency.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GREDLE
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-04-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-04-13

Total views
4 ( #39,464 of 38,849 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #36,965 of 38,849 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.