When Is A Belief True Because Of Luck?

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):465-475 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many epistemologists are attracted to the claim that knowledge possession excludes luck. Virtue epistemologists attempt to clarify this idea by holding that knowledge requires apt belief: belief that is true because of an agent's epistemic virtues, and not because of luck. Thinking about aptness may have the potential to make progress on important questions in epistemology, but first we must possess an adequate account of when a belief is true because of luck. Existing treatments of aptness assume a simple and natural view of luck attribution, according to which the success of a performance is attributable to luck if one of the principal causes of the success is a lucky event. I show that this view is false, and should be replaced. This has major implications for virtue-theoretic accounts of knowledge, as well as the role of luck in epistemology more generally
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-08-27
Latest version: 2 (2013-08-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
352 ( #17,931 of 2,444,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #49,236 of 2,444,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.