Complementarity of the Calculative and Qualitative Description

Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 33 (2):271-297 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Phenomenology and Quantum theory have defined themselves against the subject-object tradition of thought and against the modern objectivistic attempt to unify explanation of reality or being. Scientific technology and calculative way of thinking have prevailed over meditative and qualitative thinking in modern times. Despite scientific efforts to eliminate any inconsistency caused by metaphysical speculations and systems, in everyday life and science we encounter such phenomena which cannot be explained unambiguously and fully on the basis of purely conventional criteria. This paper focuses on Bohr's framework of complementarity. The idea enables us exploring and describing a given phenomenon in such manner that we get adequate knowledge of the same phenomenon or subject of interest only by completing incompatible descriptions.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GRYCOT
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-11

Total views
23 ( #53,072 of 54,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #54,518 of 54,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.