Yet Another Skeptical Solution

Philosophia 47 (1):117-129 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper puts forward a new skeptical solution to Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox, a solution which revolves around the idea that human communication does not require meaning facts - at least as defined by Kripke. After a brief discussion of the paradox, I explain why I think that Kripkenstein’s solution needs revision and argue that the main goal of a skeptical solution to the rule-following paradox should be that of showing that communication does not require meaning. After that, I offer two arguments for the thesis that communication does not require meaning. The first argument instantiates a rather direct strategy and focuses on the description of a concrete case of communication without meaning. The second one is more indirect in that I start by describing a world in which, although there are meaning facts, communication does not depend on them. The paper’s last section deals with the issue of meaning talk.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-02-04
Latest version: 3 (2019-11-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Content Normativity.Glüer, Kathrin & Wikforss, Åsa

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
292 ( #13,289 of 45,262 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #6,130 of 45,262 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.