Yet Another Skeptical Solution

Philosophia 47 (1):117-129 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper puts forward a new skeptical solution to Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox, a solution which revolves around the idea that human communication does not require meaning facts - at least as defined by Kripke. After a brief discussion of the paradox, I explain why I think that Kripkenstein’s solution needs revision and argue that the main goal of a skeptical solution to the rule-following paradox should be that of showing that communication does not require meaning. After that, I offer two arguments for the thesis that communication does not require meaning. The first argument instantiates a rather direct strategy and focuses on the description of a concrete case of communication without meaning. The second one is more indirect in that I start by describing a world in which, although there are meaning facts, communication does not depend on them. The paper’s last section deals with the issue of meaning talk.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-02-04
Latest version: 3 (2019-11-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
465 ( #13,372 of 2,448,370 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #14,496 of 2,448,370 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.