“Nameless Singularity”: Levinas on Individuation and Ethical Singularity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Marion has criticized Levinas for failing to account for the individuation of the Other, thus leaving the face of the Other abstract, neutral and anonymous. I defend Levinas against this critique by distinguishing between the individuation of the subject through hypostasis and the singularization of self and Other through ethical response. An analysis of the instant in Levinas’s early and late work shows that it is possible to speak of a “nameless singularity” which does not collapse into neutrality or abstraction, but rather explains the sense in which anyone is responsible for any Other who happens to come along
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
1085-1968
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GUENS
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-12-01

Total views
1,083 ( #3,578 of 58,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
163 ( #3,137 of 58,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.