Parts of Ockham’s razor and their counterparts

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
William of Ockham seems to have endorsed the view (i) that a whole is its parts, (ii) that some things are such that whether they together compose a whole is contingent, and (iii) that parts are ontologically prior to the whole they compose. Ockhamist Composition as Identity is the conjunction of these three claims. It seems doubly absurd since Leibniz’s Law arguments can be run against both the conjunction of (i) and (ii) and that of (i) and (iii). In this article, I appeal to recent developments in counterpart theory to block these arguments and adequately interpret the Ockhamist version of the view that composition is identity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GUIPOO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-23

Total views
29 ( #47,696 of 51,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #20,115 of 51,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.