Population Axiology and the Possibility of a Fourth Category of Absolute Value

Economics and Philosophy 36 (1):81-110 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Critical-Range Utilitarianism is a variant of Total Utilitarianism which can avoid both the Repugnant Conclusion and the Sadistic Conclusion in population ethics. Yet Standard Critical-Range Utilitarianism entails the Weak Sadistic Conclusion, that is, it entails that each population consisting of lives at a bad well-being level is not worse than some population consisting of lives at a good well-being level. In this paper, I defend a version of Critical-Range Utilitarianism which does not entail the Weak Sadistic Conclusion. This is made possible by a fourth category of absolute value in addition to goodness, badness, and neutrality.
Reprint years
2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GUSPAA-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-23

Total views
49 ( #50,753 of 58,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #36,048 of 58,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.