Ockham's Scientia Argument for Mental Language

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
William Ockham held that, in addition to written and spoken language, there exists a mental language, a structured representational system common to all thinking beings. Here I present and evaluate an argument found in several places across Ockham's corpus, wherein he argues that positing a mental language is necessary for the nominalist to meet certain ontological constraints imposed by Aristotle’s account of scientific demonstration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
340 ( #11,629 of 46,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #7,419 of 46,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.