Just War contra Drone Warfare

Conatus 8 (2):217-239 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I present a two-pronged argument for the immorality of contemporary, asymmetric drone warfare, based on my new interpretations of the just war principles of “proportionality” and “moral equivalence of combatants” (MEC). The justification for these new interpretations is that drone warfare continues to this day, having survived despite arguments against it that are based on traditional interpretations of just war theory (including one from Michael Walzer). On the basis of my argument, I echo Harry Van der Linden’s call for “an international treaty banning all weaponized UAV [uninhabited aerial vehicles].”

Author's Profile

Joshua M. Hall
University of Alabama, Birmingham

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-30

Downloads
295 (#55,783)

6 months
200 (#13,692)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?