Moral Luck and Control

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 43 (1):42-58 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is no such thing as moral luck or everyone is profoundly mistaken about its nature and a radical rethinking of moral luck is needed. The argument to be developed is not complicated, and relies almost entirely on premises that should seem obviously correct to anyone who follows the moral luck literature. The conclusion, however, is surprising and disturbing. The classic cases of moral luck always involve an agent who lacks control over an event whose occurrence affects her praiseworthiness or blameworthiness. Close examination of what it is to have control or to lack it reveals the logical space for counterexamples that do not fit the pattern constitutive of moral luck, and so unravel the whole.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-11
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #46,846 of 52,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #33,595 of 52,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.