The Kalam cosmological argument: Critiquing a recent defence

Think 20 (57):153-165 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
ABSTRACTIn the late 1970s the big bang model of cosmology was widely accepted and interpreted as implying the universe had a beginning. At the end of that decade William Lane Craig revived an argument for God known as the Kalam Cosmological Argument based on this scientific consensus. Furthermore, he linked the big bang to the supposed biblical concept of creation ex nihilo found in Genesis. I shall critique Craig's position as expressed in a more recent update and argue that contemporary cosmology no longer understands the big bang as the ultimate beginning, seriously undermining the KCA. I will further contend that book of Genesis should not be understood as describing creation ex nihilo anyway.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #53,054 of 57,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #22,703 of 57,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.