Patient-Relativity in Morality

Ethics 127 (1):06-26 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is common to distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are agent-relative from those that are agent-neutral. One can also distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are moment-relative from those that are moment-neutral. In this article, I introduce a third distinction that stands alongside these two distinctions—the distinction between moral rules, reasons, or values that are patient-relative and those that are patient-neutral. I then show how patient-relativity plays an important role in several moral theories, gives us a better understanding of agent-relativity and moment-relativity, and provides a novel objection to Derek Parfit’s “appeal to full relativity” argument.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HAMPIM
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Relativized Rankings.Hammerton, Matthew

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-14

Total views
129 ( #26,666 of 46,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #27,043 of 46,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.