Against Legal Punishment

In Matthew C. Altman (ed.), Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment. Palgrave (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that legal punishment is morally wrong because it’s too morally risky. I first briefly explain how my argument differs from similar ones in the philosophical literature on legal punishment. Then I explain why legal punishment is morally risky, argue that it’s too morally risky, and discuss objections. In a nutshell, my argument goes as follows. Legal punishment is wrong because we can never sufficiently reduce the risk of doing wrong when we legally punish people. We can never sufficiently reduce this risk because wrongful punishment is much worse than wrongful non-punishment and because punishment’s permissibility depends on the answers to a variety of difficult philosophical questions about which we’re fallible.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANALP-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-02-04
Latest version: 2 (2022-02-04)
View other versions
Added to PP
2022-02-04

Downloads
100 (#53,667)

6 months
39 (#21,643)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?