Dispositions, rules, and finks

Philosophical Studies 140 (2):285 - 298 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper discusses the prospects of a dispositional solution to the Kripke–Wittgenstein rule-following puzzle. Recent attempts to employ dispositional approaches to this puzzle have appealed to the ideas of finks and antidotes—interfering dispositions and conditions—to explain why the rule-following disposition is not always manifested. We argue that this approach fails: agents cannot be supposed to have straightforward dispositions to follow a rule which are in some fashion masked by other, contrary dispositions of the agent, because in all cases, at least some of the interfering dispositions are both relatively permanent and intrinsic to the agent. The presence of these intrinsic and relatively permanent states renders the ascription of a rule-following disposition to the agent false
Reprint years
2008
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANDRA
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
778 ( #6,791 of 2,448,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,267 of 2,448,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.