Essentially Comparative Value Does Not Threaten Transitivity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The essentially comparative conception of value entails that the value of a state of affairs does not depend solely upon features intrinsic to the state of affairs, but also upon extrinsic features, such as the set of feasible alternatives. It has been argued that this conception of value gives us reason to abandon the transitivity of the better than relation. This paper shows that the support for intransitivity derived from this conception of value is very limited. On its most plausible interpretations, it merely provides a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for intransitivity. It is further argued that the essentially comparative conception of value appears to support a disjunctive conclusion: there is incommensurability of value or betterness is not transitive. Of these two alternatives, incommensurability is preferable, because it is far less threatening to our other axiological commitments.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANECV-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-09-30
Latest version: 2 (2015-10-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-30

Total views
278 ( #10,080 of 38,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #21,331 of 38,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.