Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Evaluation By David K. Henderson and John Greco [Book Review]

Analysis 78 (1):173-177 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Trust. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comWhat is the point of epistemic evaluation? Why do we appraise others as knowers, understanders and so forth? Epistemology has traditionally focused on analysing the conditions under which one has knowledge, leaving aside for the most part questions about the roles played by epistemic evaluation in our lives more broadly. This fact is borne out by the so-called Gettier literature. For decades, epistemologists have attempted to ferret out the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge, but few have asked why knowledge would have the features suggested by conceptual analysis. Suppose, for example, that knowledge really is non-lucky justified true belief. Why would this be? What use do we have for a concept that is demarcated by those conditions? Is there something abhorrent about coming...
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANEEP
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Motivated Contextualism.Henderson, David

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-17

Total views
103 ( #21,328 of 37,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #34,114 of 37,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.