On an Alleged Truth/Falsity Asymmetry in Context Shifting Experiments

Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):530-545 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Keith DeRose has argued that context shifting experiments should be designed in a specific way in order to accommodate what he calls a ‘truth/falsity asymmetry’. I explain and critique DeRose's reasons for proposing this modification to contextualist methodology, drawing on recent experimental studies of DeRose's bank cases as well as experimental findings about the verification of affirmative and negative statements. While DeRose's arguments for his particular modification to contextualist methodology fail, the lesson of his proposal is that there is good reason to pay close attention to several subtle aspects of the design of context shifting experiments
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-12-02
Latest version: 2 (2013-04-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Experimenting on Contextualism.Hansen, Nat & Chemla, Emmanuel

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
255 ( #10,586 of 38,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #25,509 of 38,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.