Rational Choice and the Transitivity of Betterness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If A is better than B and B is better than C, then A is better than C, right? Larry Temkin and Stuart Rachels say: No! Betterness is nontransitive, they claim. In this paper, I discuss the central type of argument advanced by Temkin and Rachels for this radical idea, and argue that, given this view very likely has sceptical implications for practical reason, we would do well to identify alternative responses. I propose one such response, which employs the idea that rational agents might regard some options as incommensurate in value, and will reasonably employ a heuristic of status quo maintenance to avoid suboptimal choices from incommensurate goods
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANRCA-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-04-20

Total views
596 ( #8,004 of 56,905 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,402 of 56,905 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.