Two Claims About Desert

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):41-56 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers claim that it is always intrinsically good when people get what they deserve and that there is always at least some reason to give people what they deserve. I highlight problems with this view and defend an alternative. I have two aims. First, I want to expose a gap in certain desert-based justifications of punishment. Second, I want to show that those of us who have intuitions at odds with these justifications have an alternative account of desert at our disposal – one that may lend our intuitions more credibility

Author's Profile

Nathan Hanna
Drexel University

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-02

Downloads
73 (#92,255)

6 months
429 (#3,970)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?