Unfinkable dispositions

Synthese 160 (2):297 - 308 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper develops two ideas with respect to dispositional properties: (1) Adapting a suggestion of Sungho Choi, it appears the conceptual distinction between dispositional and categorical properties can be drawn in terms of susceptibility to finks and antidotes. Dispositional, but not categorical properties, are not susceptible to intrinsic finks, nor are they remediable by intrinsic antidotes. (2) If correct, this suggests the possibility that some dispositions—those which lack any causal basis—may be insusceptible to any fink or antidote. Since finks and antidotes are a major obstacle to a conditional analysis of dispositions, these dispositions that are unfinkable may be successfully analysed by the conditional analysis of dispositions. This result is of importance for those who think that the fundamental properties might be dispositions which lack any distinct causal basis, because it suggests that these properties, if they exist, can be analysed by simple conditionals and that they will not be subject to ceteris paribus laws.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANUD
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-09-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Dispositions.Mumford, Stephen
Laws in Nature.Mumford, Stephen

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Opposing Powers.Clarke, Randolph
Dispositions, Rules and Finks.Handfield, Toby & Bird, Alexander

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
561 ( #3,569 of 37,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #15,101 of 37,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.