Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is often claimed that the greatest value of the Bayesian framework in cognitive science consists in its unifying power. Several Bayesian cognitive scientists assume that unification is obviously linked to explanatory power. But this link is not obvious, as unification in science is a heterogeneous notion, which may have little to do with explanation. While a crucial feature of most adequate explanations in cognitive science is that they reveal aspects of the causal mechanism that produces the phenomenon to be explained, the kind of unification afforded by the Bayesian framework to cognitive science does not necessarily reveal aspects of a mechanism. Bayesian unification, nonetheless, can place fruitful constraints on causal–mechanical explanation. 1 Introduction2 What a Great Many Phenomena Bayesian Decision Theory Can Model3 The Case of Information Integration4 How Do Bayesian Models Unify?5 Bayesian Unification: What Constraints Are There on Mechanistic Explanation?5.1 Unification constrains mechanism discovery5.2 Unification constrains the identification of relevant mechanistic factors5.3 Unification constrains confirmation of competitive mechanistic models6 ConclusionAppendix.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2014, 2015, 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HARBCS
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-03-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Monopoly, and Neglected Frameworks.Colombo, Matteo; Elkin, Lee & Hartmann, Stephan

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-03-11

Total views
367 ( #10,385 of 45,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #17,229 of 45,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.