Being together, worlds apart: a virtual-worldly phenomenology

Human Studies:1-28 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Previous work in Game Studies has centered on several loci of investigation in seeking to understand virtual gameworlds. First, researchers have scrutinized the concept of the virtual world itself and how it relates to the idea of “the magic circle”. Second, the field has outlined various forms of experienced “presence”. Third, scholarship has noted that the boundaries between the world of everyday life and virtual worlds are porous, and that this fosters a multiplicity of identities as players identify both with themselves-offline and themselves-in-game. Despite widespread agreement that these topics are targets for research, so far those working on these topics do not have mutually agreed-upon framework. Here we draw upon the work of Alfred Schutz to take up this call. We provide a phenomenological framework which can be used to describe the phenomena of interest to Game Studies, as well as open new avenues of inquiry, in a way acceptable and useful to all. This helps to distinguish the core of the field from the supplemental theoretical and critical commitments which characterize diverse approaches within the field.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HARBTW
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Experience and Judgment.Husserl, Edmund; Landgrebe, L.; Churchill, J. S. & Ameriks, K.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-13

Total views
21 ( #34,490 of 38,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #17,376 of 38,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.